Second Sitting: The Lost Art of the Long Lunch

In Britain, this is practically science fiction. The working lunch, once a civilised institution involving cloth napkins and a decent bottle shared between colleagues, has been reduced to a sandwich eaten at a desk or, at best, forty-five minutes in a chain restaurant before the afternoon's obligations reassert themselves. We are, as a culture, deeply suspicious of pleasure taken in the middle of the day.
Elsewhere in Europe, the long lunch has proved more resilient. In Spain, the sobremesa, the period of conversation and lingering that follows a meal, is treated not as an indulgence but as a social necessity. The word has no direct English equivalent, which may be part of the problem. We lack even the vocabulary to describe the pleasure of sitting at a table after eating simply to be present with other people.

Some employers are beginning to reconsider the desk lunch with genuine scepticism. Research into productivity and cognitive performance consistently suggests that proper breaks, including meals eaten away from screens in the company of others, improve afternoon output more reliably than the grim efficiency of eating while working. The long lunch, it turns out, may be a sound investment.
The bouchon in Lyon will take your booking for noon. It will not, however, guarantee when you will leave. That, as any self-respecting Lyonnais will tell you, rather depends on how the conversation is going.
Features















